Center for Nanoscale Science & Technolgy home page NIST home page Electron Physics Group home page Electron Physics Group Research Areas page Electron Physics Group Publications page Collaborative Research Facilities page Electron Physics Group Staff page Electron Physics Group What's New page
• Nanomagnetics
• Atomic scale characterization & fabrication
• Modeling nanostructures in mesoscopic environments
• Nanoscale measurement & fabrication using laser-controlled atoms
• Atom Optics
• Magneto-Optic Microscopy
• Magnetic Force Microscopy
• Nanoscale Physics
• SEMPA
• UHV STM

Polarized Light Emission from the Metal-Metal STM Junction

Measurable macroscopic magnetic properties are controlled by microscopic properties for which there are insufficient direct measurement techniques. Technological advances leading to higher density magnetic information storage and smaller magnetic devices are driving magnetic measurement requirements further towards nanometer resolution. The development of a general method of adding magnetic contrast to scanning tunneling microscopy is a widely recognized challenge that would not only allow high spatial resolution magnetic imaging, but would also allow correlation of magnetic microstructure with topographic and spectroscopic properties measured by the STM.

In light emission from a metal-metal STM junction, electromagnetic modes of the coupled tip-sample system are excited by inelastic electron tunneling as shown in Fig. 1. The resulting dipolar radiation is expected to be linearly polarized in a plane defined by the direction of the tunneling current and the emitted light. Alvarado and coworkers reported that STM-stimulated luminescence emitted in tunneling between a W tip and a Co ferromagnetic film had an unexpected circularly polarized component, the sign of which was related to the direction of magnetization of the Co. The promise of this intriguing result for magnetic imaging on the nanometer scale led us to make further measurements of this type. Our goals were 1) to test the generality of this effect by measuring a different ferromagnetic material, 2) to eliminate surface roughness as a possible source of change in circular polarization, and 3) to fully characterize the polarization of the tunneling-induced luminescence to try to understand the underlying mechanism. To accomplish the first two of these goals we use an Fe(001) whisker which we have shown with RHEED and STM to be a high quality single crystal that has a very flat surface with terrace widths of approximately 1 micrometer.

The polarization of the STM-induced luminescence for W(111) tips and samples of Au(111) and Fe(001) was fully characterized by measuring the Stokes parameters of the radiation using the apparatus shown in Fig. 2. For both Au(111) and Fe(001), the luminescence is fully polarized within experimental uncertainty and predominantly linearly polarized as expected for dipole radiation. There is a tip-dependent circular polarization for both Au and Fe, which we attribute to tip asymmetries. The small circular polarization component in the Fe data is shown in Fig. 3, and is seen to be independent of sample bias. Most importantly, there is no change in the circular polarization that can be associated with a change in magnetization of the Fe(001) within an experimental uncertainty of approximately ± 2%. A number of factors make the measurement of the circular polarization of the luminescence vs sample magnetization difficult: 1) low count rates, 2) circular polarization from tip dependent asymmetries, and 3) necessity of protecting the tip during sample magnetization reversal. Because of these factors, we have not investigated other combinations of tip materials and ferromagnetic samples. We conclude that measuring the circular polarization of STM-stimulated photon emission from a metal-metal junction does not provide a general means to achieve magnetic contrast in STM.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Schematic of the inelastic tunneling process leading to photon emission in a metal-metal STM junction.


Figure 2
Figure 2: (a) rotaing quarter-wave retarder/fixed linear analyzer techniqye for determining the Stokes parameters. (b) Schematic of the experimental apparatus for polarization measurements of the STM-induced luminescene.


Figure 3
Figure 3: The circular polaization measured for tunneling between W(111) and Fe(001) as a function of sample voltage and sample magnetization is shown by the filled squares and circles. The difference in the circular polarization on reversing the sample magnetization is plotted against sample voltage at the bottom. There is no magnetization-dependant effect within experimental uncertainty.


Publications
Polarized light emission from the metal-metal STM junction

Staff listing
Daniel T. Pierce
Joseph A. Stroscio
Robert J. Celotta

Former staff listing
Angela Davies - University of North Carolina (Charlotte)


Online: July 1999
Last Updated: February 2008

egpwebmaster@nist.gov