Center for Nanoscale Science & Technolgy home page NIST home page Electron Physics Group home page Electron Physics Group Research Areas page Electron Physics Group Publications page Collaborative Research Facilities page Electron Physics Group Staff page Electron Physics Group What's New page
• Nanomagnetics
• Atomic scale characterization & fabrication
• Modeling nanostructures in mesoscopic environments
• Nanoscale measurement & fabrication using laser-controlled atoms
• Atom Optics
• Magneto-Optic Microscopy
• Magnetic Force Microscopy
• Nanoscale Physics
• SEMPA
• UHV STM

Theory of magnetocrystalline anisotropy

The direction of a magnetization relative to body that supports it is determined mainly by two effects, shape anisotropy and magnetocrystalline anisotropy. The first arises from magnetostatic effects and the second from spin-orbit coupling between the spins and the lattice of the material. The magnetostatic effects can be calculated from micromagnetic calculations, but the magnetocrystalline anisotropy must be computed from the electronic structure of the material. This is an important quantity because it determines whether a magnetic material can be made into a good hard magnet, a good soft magnet or neither. Hard magnets are an essential component of electromagnetic motors and soft magnets are an essential component of transformers.

Experimental and calculated values of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy for Fe, Co, and Ni.

Unfortunately, the electronic structure calculations used for solids cannot accurately predict the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the simplest systems, the 3d transition metals, Fe, Co, and Ni. The figure above shows the results of several calculations in comparison with experiment.

We have carried out well converged numerical calculations of the anisotropy for these systems. We have investigated the possibility that the error in previous calculations arose from an approximate treatment of the spin-orbit interaction. We improved the description of this interaction and found very little improvement in the comparison with experiment. In addition, we carried out the first numerically converged calculations for Co in its ground state hexagonal-close-packed structure. It is "common lore" that these types of calculations work better for low symmetry systems like Co. We found that the disagreement between calculation and experiment for Co is much larger in magnitude that that for either Fe or Ni.


Related Publications listing
The Spin-Other-Orbit Interaction and Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy
A Gradient Search Method for Orbital-Dependent Charge-Density and Current Density Functional Calculations

Staff listings
Mark D. Stiles

Collaborators listing
Andrew Zangwill - Georgia Institute of Technology
Ross Hyman - DePaul University
Samed Halilov - Naval Research Laboratory



Online: February 2002
Last Updated: February 2008

Website Comments:egpwebmaster@nist.gov